![]() Some old Southwest Conference series can come back with Arkansas playing Texas and Texas A&M again. One Big Eight series that could return is Missouri-Oklahoma. It also would be nice to rekindle series from conferences past. Plus if you’re giving UT both Bama and UF, they need someone like Vandy as their third. It’s an in-state matchup, and having each of those happen annually would be nice. Tennessee-Vanderbilt probably would also go in this bucket. If the Volunteers started winning more than once a decade again, it could easily heat right back up to what it once was. That’s the point.įlorida-Tennessee belongs here, as plenty of fans really do care on both sides. Here we’re delving into the subjective, so I’m sure you’ll disagree about something from here on out. Its one-sided nature means it’s not hallowed like the above rivalries are. Tennessee-Vanderbilt also isn’t on here despite it being one of the few in-state series the league has. The Gators and Vols seldom played each other before ’92. Florida-Tennessee isn’t on here, mainly because it’s not historical in the way the rest of these are. Any system like these will 100% preserve all of these series as permanent rivalries. On the Google spreadsheet, I’ve put those series in red to emphasize their importance to the conference. But it will mean that your system won’t be good for much beyond trolling. I mean, if you want to give Alabama the combo of Georgia, LSU, and Oklahoma out of spite, well, I can’t stop you. These rivalries are non-negotiable if you want to have your system look serious. Basically if a rivalry goes back a century and also has a well-known name, it’s going to be preserved. It will be importing some more by adding Texas and Oklahoma. The SEC, more than any other conference, has a lot of historical rivalries that the league has gone to great lengths to protect in the several scheduling incarnations since 1992 expansion. Hang with me here for a bit before you dive in, though. I’ve created a downloadable Google spreadsheet (go to File > Download to grab a copy) that you can use as a worksheet to create your own permanent rivalry system that’ll be sure to enrage everyone who sees it. Whoo buddy, there be a lot of dragons in setting up those rotations. The 3 is the part everyone’s already starting to fight over, though you can get extra credit for trying to balance out the -6-6 part. So since arguing about scheduling is one of the most fun things in SEC country, I want to help you out by giving you a template for creating your own 3-6-6 system. No matter what format wins out, there are going to be a lot of people spittin’ mad about it. Last time around, the conference missed the deadline by a whole two years, making one-off schedules for both 20 before shuffling a couple cross-division rivalries and establishing the current rotation in 2014. It’s preferable to the interminably long divisional rotation that exists now, where ten years after expansion Georgia has still never visited Texas A&M and Missouri has never been to Auburn.įootball scheduling is the most contentious thing the SEC does. ![]() That means any player who sticks around at a school for his full eligibility will have the entire SEC experience. It has the advantage of making sure everyone plays a home-and-home (neutral site rivalries aside) with everyone else at least once every four years. In the eventual 16-team SEC, it’d most likely take the form of 3-6-6 in a nine-game schedule. Virginia Tech might have annual series with Virginia, Boston College, and Miami, but Miami might have FSU and Georgia Tech in addition to VT. In a 3-5-5, there aren’t closed groups like that. ![]() It’s different than pods because with pods, there are four groups of teams that all have permanent rivalries with each other. It’s proposing a 3-3-5 format: each team will have three permanent rivals, and then they’ll do alternating home-and-home series with the ten other conference teams. The permanent rivals format hasn’t been tried, but the ACC is seriously considering a switch to it. ![]() It was short lived and not generally seen as successful. Pods have actually been tried before when the WAC expanded to 16 teams in the 1990s. Two more divergent schedule types that have been widely discussed are now possible too: pods and permanent rivals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |